agreed. to my knowledge he has not made a connection to any of us, yet. taking into account the possibility that he might, if publicizing dreaming were to trigger anything, the repercussions HERE would likely be negligible. he has no company to dissolve, no proof we were ever in contact with him, and no judicial system, at least none that i have seen discounting the deities, to back him were he able to scrounge together some evidence to the contrary.
that being said. inevitably people are going to make uninformed comparisons. should fischer hold only negative opinions of dreaming, he could very well start a panic as to the recreational uses of dreaming. regardless of whether he recognizes us or not, any kind of doubt would be detrimental to the business as an entirely legal venture. the way we handle marketing the dream needs to be prudent and take his word vs public approval into account.
is messing about in his head to change more of his beliefs worth the effort?
[ He doesn't ask if it's safe, because neither of them really know. He doesn't ask if it's the right thing to do, because they both know. ]
TEXT;
that being said. inevitably people are going to make uninformed comparisons. should fischer hold only negative opinions of dreaming, he could very well start a panic as to the recreational uses of dreaming. regardless of whether he recognizes us or not, any kind of doubt would be detrimental to the business as an entirely legal venture. the way we handle marketing the dream needs to be prudent and take his word vs public approval into account.
is messing about in his head to change more of his beliefs worth the effort?
[ He doesn't ask if it's safe, because neither of them really know. He doesn't ask if it's the right thing to do, because they both know. ]